This work presents a practical and general methodology for determining Jones–Wilkins–Lee (JWL) Equation of State (EOS) parameters through numerical optimization, which is demonstrated here for the military explosive PG3 (similar to C4). The approach couples the Sequential with Domain Reduction strategy implemented in LS-OPT with a two-dimensional axisymmetric LS-DYNA model used to simulate height-of-burst spherical air-blast detonations. Three charge weights (0.7, 1.0, and 1.4 kg) were tested, with pressure sensors placed radially at 2, 4, and 8 meters. Pressure–time histories from the 2 m and 4 m sensors of the 0.7 kg and 1.4 kg tests were used for calibration, while the 1.0 kg case and 8 m sensors were left for validation.The optimized JWL parameters reproduced the experimental overpressures in LS-DYNA with errors mostly below ± 10 %, accurately capturing both the shape and magnitude of the positive phase. These parameters were further validated using Viper::Blast software, achieving good agreement in peak pressures and impulses.Overall, the study demonstrates a simple and cost-effective alternative to traditional methods, such as the cylinder test, for determining EOS parameters. By relying only on basic air blast tests and numerical optimization, the proposed methodology significantly reduces experimental complexity while maintaining high predictive accuracy, making it well suited for a wide range of blast modelling applications.
This work presents a practical and general methodology for determining Jones–Wilkins–Lee (JWL) Equation of State (EOS) parameters through numerical optimization, which is demonstrated here for the military explosive PG3 (similar to C4). The approach couples the Sequential with Domain Reduction strategy implemented in LS-OPT with a two-dimensional axisymmetric LS-DYNA model used to simulate height-of-burst spherical air-blast detonations. Three charge weights (0.7, 1.0, and 1.4 kg) were tested, with pressure sensors placed radially at 2, 4, and 8 meters. Pressure–time histories from the 2 m and 4 m sensors of the 0.7 kg and 1.4 kg tests were used for calibration, while the 1.0 kg case and 8 m sensors were left for validation.The optimized JWL parameters reproduced the experimental overpressures in LS-DYNA with errors mostly below ± 10 %, accurately capturing both the shape and magnitude of the positive phase. These parameters were further validated using Viper::Blast software, achieving good agreement in peak pressures and impulses.Overall, the study demonstrates a simple and cost-effective alternative to traditional methods, such as the cylinder test, for determining EOS parameters. By relying only on basic air blast tests and numerical optimization, the proposed methodology significantly reduces experimental complexity while maintaining high predictive accuracy, making it well suited for a wide range of blast modelling applications. Read More
Related posts:
Comparative analysis of control strategies for the reduction of tracking error in CPV systems
Experimental response and numerical modelling of a full-scale two-span concrete slab frame subjected to blast load
Experimental and numerical characterization of column webs/faces loaded out-of-plane in steel joints
Modelización numérica de muro de hormigón armado frente a explosiones
Mechanical characterization and visco-hyperelastic modeling of epithelial cells: Pressure-rate dependency of the apparent elastic modulus
The OVERCOME Project: Overall Perspective and Progress