Comparative analysis of control strategies for the reduction of tracking error in CPV systems

Bookmark (0)
Please login to bookmark Close

In this work, an experimental methodology is shown that allows selecting the best controller alternative to govern a two-axis solar tracking system in trajectory tracking tasks. This, based on the comparison of the performance of different controllers during the tracking of a solar trajectory (obtained offline with the help of a numerical method) using a prototype solar tracking system in a simulation environment. The selection of the controllers is based on the performance reported in the literature and commercially for other alternatives based on parameters such as: tracking error and energy consumption, computational cost, ease of implementation, ease of tuning, among others. However, for the final validation and selection of the controller, a brief analysis of the numerical results obtained during the follow-up tests is provided.

​In this work, an experimental methodology is shown that allows selecting the best controller alternative to govern a two-axis solar tracking system in trajectory tracking tasks. This, based on the comparison of the performance of different controllers during the tracking of a solar trajectory (obtained offline with the help of a numerical method) using a prototype solar tracking system in a simulation environment. The selection of the controllers is based on the performance reported in the literature and commercially for other alternatives based on parameters such as: tracking error and energy consumption, computational cost, ease of implementation, ease of tuning, among others. However, for the final validation and selection of the controller, a brief analysis of the numerical results obtained during the follow-up tests is provided. Read More