This study examines the challenges regarding the quantification of modularity effects, focusing on data quality, availability, and management practices within four industrial production companies in Denmark. While the literature identifies many effects of modularity, a substantial gap persists regarding data availability and quality for accurate and practical quantification. This study reveals that less than half of the modularity-related effects have sufficient data for analysis. Furthermore, critical data such as bill-of-material have observed frequent inconsistencies with far-reaching consequences that further undermine data reliability. Silo effects also hinder knowledge sharing and limit holistic assessments of modularity effects. Traditional cost accounting methods often overlook indirect costs, leading to underestimations of modularity’s economic impact, while this study finds that even direct costs lack accuracy and consistency. The results in this paper imply that the Danish industry, and likely other sectors too, may benefit from more rigorous data practices, including tracking time expenditures in overhead departments, to facilitate modularity quantification. Future research may include how accounting systems impact data management, developing structured data management frameworks, including artificial intelligence, to enhance data quality, improve quantifiability, and encourage knowledge sharing within and across departments. Ultimately, these advancements would support informed, data-driven decisions regarding modular product development and support bridging the gap between research and successful industrial application.
This study examines the challenges regarding the quantification of modularity effects, focusing on data quality, availability, and management practices within four industrial production companies in Denmark. While the literature identifies many effects of modularity, a substantial gap persists regarding data availability and quality for accurate and practical quantification. This study reveals that less than half of the modularity-related effects have sufficient data for analysis. Furthermore, critical data such as bill-of-material have observed frequent inconsistencies with far-reaching consequences that further undermine data reliability. Silo effects also hinder knowledge sharing and limit holistic assessments of modularity effects. Traditional cost accounting methods often overlook indirect costs, leading to underestimations of modularity’s economic impact, while this study finds that even direct costs lack accuracy and consistency. The results in this paper imply that the Danish industry, and likely other sectors too, may benefit from more rigorous data practices, including tracking time expenditures in overhead departments, to facilitate modularity quantification. Future research may include how accounting systems impact data management, developing structured data management frameworks, including artificial intelligence, to enhance data quality, improve quantifiability, and encourage knowledge sharing within and across departments. Ultimately, these advancements would support informed, data-driven decisions regarding modular product development and support bridging the gap between research and successful industrial application. Read More
Related posts:
Measuring Impact of Cloud Computing and Knowledge Management in Software Development and Innovation
What is Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK)?
63% of IT professionals express desire for a mentor
Dimensions of knowledge governance in a multi-PMO project context
Advancing Sustainable Performance in Healthcare: Mediating Roles of Green HRM and Green Innovation Under Green Transformational Leadership
A comparative study of the USA and EU allocation tables using a knowledge graph model