Medium-sized cities face unique challenges in fostering sustainable mobility due to their socio-spatial characteristics, including recent decentralized services and urban sprawl. This study examines user-centric factors influencing mobility behaviors in Caceres, Spain, through qualitative focus group analysis with 18 participants across two age groups. By employing a co-occurrence methodology, this research identifies key relationships within four thematic areas: public transport, active mobility, innovation, and urban planning. The findings reveal persistent car dependency despite sustainable policies, driven by the following: (1) inadequate public transport coordination between urban and regional areas, poor information availability, and lack of service synchronization; (2) perceived safety concerns, insufficient infrastructure for cycling, and ineffective pedestrianization strategies; (3) limited adoption of technological solutions due to cultural barriers, preference for informal arrangements, and usability issues with transport apps; and (4) mismatches between urban form and service distribution, proximity perception, and consumer preferences reinforcing car dependency. This study underscores the need for integrated transport systems, mixed land-use planning, and improved accessibility measures to achieve equitable and sustainable mobility transitions. The conclusion includes a series of policy recommendations.
Medium-sized cities face unique challenges in fostering sustainable mobility due to their socio-spatial characteristics, including recent decentralized services and urban sprawl. This study examines user-centric factors influencing mobility behaviors in Caceres, Spain, through qualitative focus group analysis with 18 participants across two age groups. By employing a co-occurrence methodology, this research identifies key relationships within four thematic areas: public transport, active mobility, innovation, and urban planning. The findings reveal persistent car dependency despite sustainable policies, driven by the following: (1) inadequate public transport coordination between urban and regional areas, poor information availability, and lack of service synchronization; (2) perceived safety concerns, insufficient infrastructure for cycling, and ineffective pedestrianization strategies; (3) limited adoption of technological solutions due to cultural barriers, preference for informal arrangements, and usability issues with transport apps; and (4) mismatches between urban form and service distribution, proximity perception, and consumer preferences reinforcing car dependency. This study underscores the need for integrated transport systems, mixed land-use planning, and improved accessibility measures to achieve equitable and sustainable mobility transitions. The conclusion includes a series of policy recommendations. Read More
Related posts:
Book of Abstract. Proximity Planning International Congress
How do German cities translate global sustainability visions into local mobility planning? A quantitative analysis of planners’ perspectives and priorities
Application of the Node-Place Model in Algiers (Algeria)
Strategic Prioritization of Sustainable Development Goal 11 Targets to Mitigate the Impact of COVID-19: Insights from Cuenca’s Urban Future
Evaluating sustainability and innovation of mobility patterns in Spanish cities. Analysis by size and urban typology
Assessing Service Imbalances as Contributing Factors to Mobility Issues in the Metropolitan District of Quito, Ecuador