Water scarcity requires efficient use, but also protection of surface water quality. Micropollutants are poorly removed in conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), necessitating the implementation of quaternary treatments to avoid their discharge. This study evaluates the environmental impacts and the cost of six treatment scenarios in a large-scale pilot plant (4-19 m(3) d(-1)) at Heiderscheidergrund WWTP (Luxembourg): stand-alone granular activated carbon (GAC) (fresh (F) and regenerated (R)), photo-Fenton (PF)+GAC (F and R), and UV/ H2O2+GAC (F and R). The environmental impacts were evaluated using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), which identified five principal impacts: global warming (GHG), photochemical ozone formation (POCP), human toxicity-cancer effects (HTP-C), resource depletion-energy carriers (E-RD), and water resource depletion (W-RD) as the most affected categories. The overall ranking of impacts across scenarios was: PF+FGAC > PF+RGAC > UV/H2O2+FGAC > UV/H2O2+RGAC > FGAC > RGAC. Electricity was the main contributor in almost all cases, whereas chemical reagents were more relevant in toxicity-related impacts. Sensitivity analysis revealed that replacing the current electric mix with 100 % renewables reduced GHG by up to 72 %, whereas 100 % fossil energy increased it by up to 173 %. For GAC, W-RD was particularly sensitive to the activation method, with alternative datasets increased up to 473 % in the fresh GAC scenario. Cost assessment showed stand-alone GAC as the cheapest option and coupled AOP-GAC systems incurring higher costs, mainly from energy. This integrated evaluation provided quantitative evidence to support the selection of sustainable quaternary treatments in line with European Union water resilience objectives.
Water scarcity requires efficient use, but also protection of surface water quality. Micropollutants are poorly removed in conventional wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), necessitating the implementation of quaternary treatments to avoid their discharge. This study evaluates the environmental impacts and the cost of six treatment scenarios in a large-scale pilot plant (4-19 m(3) d(-1)) at Heiderscheidergrund WWTP (Luxembourg): stand-alone granular activated carbon (GAC) (fresh (F) and regenerated (R)), photo-Fenton (PF)+GAC (F and R), and UV/ H2O2+GAC (F and R). The environmental impacts were evaluated using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), which identified five principal impacts: global warming (GHG), photochemical ozone formation (POCP), human toxicity-cancer effects (HTP-C), resource depletion-energy carriers (E-RD), and water resource depletion (W-RD) as the most affected categories. The overall ranking of impacts across scenarios was: PF+FGAC > PF+RGAC > UV/H2O2+FGAC > UV/H2O2+RGAC > FGAC > RGAC. Electricity was the main contributor in almost all cases, whereas chemical reagents were more relevant in toxicity-related impacts. Sensitivity analysis revealed that replacing the current electric mix with 100 % renewables reduced GHG by up to 72 %, whereas 100 % fossil energy increased it by up to 173 %. For GAC, W-RD was particularly sensitive to the activation method, with alternative datasets increased up to 473 % in the fresh GAC scenario. Cost assessment showed stand-alone GAC as the cheapest option and coupled AOP-GAC systems incurring higher costs, mainly from energy. This integrated evaluation provided quantitative evidence to support the selection of sustainable quaternary treatments in line with European Union water resilience objectives. Read More
Related posts:
Life Cycle Assessment of sulfate radical based-AOPs for wastewater disinfection
Effect of the water matrix and reactor configuration on Enterococcus sp. inactivation by UV-A activated PMS or H2O2
Micropollutants removal by full-scale UV-C/sulfate radical based Advanced Oxidation Processes
Environmental and Social Impacts of Renewable Energy-Driven Centralized Heating/Cooling Systems: A Comparison with Conventional Fossil Fuel-Based Systems
Scaling-up the use of macroscopic photo-CWPO La1-xTixFeO3/SiC alveolar foam catalyst for solar water treatment against micropollutants
Optimization of operating conditions in the activation of peroxymonosulfato and H2O2 for Enterococcus sp. inactivation: water matrix effect