During the design stages of a new geothermal heat exchanger special care is devoted to the peak heating and cooling demands of the building. These lead to extreme temperatures in the heat carrying liquid that may cause unwanted material damages in the installation. The short duration of these peak demands, of a few days at most, require the inclusion of the thermal inertia of the heat carrying liquid, the grout, and the ground located close to the boreholes in the theoretical model used to predict the thermal response of the geothermal heat exchanger. By expanding the grout and ground temperatures in terms of conveniently chosen multipoles, the present work develops such a model. The resulting enhanced multipole method, meant originally for peak heating and cooling demands, is also valid in the limit of slowly varying heat injection rates in which it delivers the same results as the classical multipole method developed by Bennet, Claesson, and Hellström.
During the design stages of a new geothermal heat exchanger special care is devoted to the peak heating and cooling demands of the building. These lead to extreme temperatures in the heat carrying liquid that may cause unwanted material damages in the installation. The short duration of these peak demands, of a few days at most, require the inclusion of the thermal inertia of the heat carrying liquid, the grout, and the ground located close to the boreholes in the theoretical model used to predict the thermal response of the geothermal heat exchanger. By expanding the grout and ground temperatures in terms of conveniently chosen multipoles, the present work develops such a model. The resulting enhanced multipole method, meant originally for peak heating and cooling demands, is also valid in the limit of slowly varying heat injection rates in which it delivers the same results as the classical multipole method developed by Bennet, Claesson, and Hellström. Read More


