Background: This study intends to assess to what extent instruments commonly used in clinical practice, as well as plasma p-tau-181, can predict the progression from MCI to dementia. The usefulness of a disease progression model (DPM) is also explored. Methods: A longitudinal, prospective nested case-control study was conducted with patients from the Geriatrics outpatient clinics who met the MCI International Working Group criteria. The patients had a first clinical interview and two follow-ups after 12 and 24 months. Validated Spanish instruments were used for assessment, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the clock test, verbal fluency, the EURO-D depression scale, Barthel’s Index, and Lawton’s Index. P-tau-181 analysis was performed with SIMOA (Single MOlecule Array). A robust parametric disease progression model (RPDPM) was developed. Results: Fifty-nine patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median age was 82.7 + /−8.7 years, 93 % had amnestic MCI and 45.8 % progressed to dementia (ICD-11 criteria) in two years. P-tau-181 was not prognostic. An RPDPM with the MMSE, clock test, and Lawton’s Index could predict progression to dementia with an AUC of 0.945. Conclusion: A combination of the MMSE, clock test, and Lawton’s Index in a DPM model predicted progression from MCI to dementia best. P-tau and other blood biomarkers did not predict progression. Our results highlight the strength of clinical variables to predict the progression of MCI.
Background: This study intends to assess to what extent instruments commonly used in clinical practice, as well as plasma p-tau-181, can predict the progression from MCI to dementia. The usefulness of a disease progression model (DPM) is also explored. Methods: A longitudinal, prospective nested case-control study was conducted with patients from the Geriatrics outpatient clinics who met the MCI International Working Group criteria. The patients had a first clinical interview and two follow-ups after 12 and 24 months. Validated Spanish instruments were used for assessment, including the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the clock test, verbal fluency, the EURO-D depression scale, Barthel’s Index, and Lawton’s Index. P-tau-181 analysis was performed with SIMOA (Single MOlecule Array). A robust parametric disease progression model (RPDPM) was developed. Results: Fifty-nine patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The median age was 82.7 + /−8.7 years, 93 % had amnestic MCI and 45.8 % progressed to dementia (ICD-11 criteria) in two years. P-tau-181 was not prognostic. An RPDPM with the MMSE, clock test, and Lawton’s Index could predict progression to dementia with an AUC of 0.945. Conclusion: A combination of the MMSE, clock test, and Lawton’s Index in a DPM model predicted progression from MCI to dementia best. P-tau and other blood biomarkers did not predict progression. Our results highlight the strength of clinical variables to predict the progression of MCI. Read More
Related posts:
Temporal ordering of cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease patients based on disease progression models
Estimating Dementia Onset: AT(N) Profiles and Predictive Modeling in Mild Cognitive Impairment Patients
Benchmarking parametric models of disease progression for early detection of cognitive decline
Temporal modeling and AT profiles in the early phase of Alzheimer’s disease
Categorical predictive and disease progression modeling in the early stage of Alzheimer’s disease
Predicting Alzheimer’s conversion in mild cognitive impairment patients using longitudinal neuroimaging and clinical markers