The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of the playing position (backs vs. pivots vs. wings) and the player role (starter vs. non-starter) on the internal match load and well-being status of female handball players after official matches. Fourteen female handball players from the Spanish 2nd Division were monitored during a half-season (13 matches, n = 102 individual observations) using the rate of perceived exertion (match RPE) and the Hooper questionnaire in MD+1 and MD+2. Differences in match RPE according to playing positions and player roles were determined by one-way ANOVA or by a paired t-test, respectively. Differences in well-being status according to playing positions or player roles and time (MD+1 and MD+2) were assessed through mixed two-way ANOVA. Furthermore, partial eta-squared (ηp<sup>2</sup>) and Cohen’s d (ES) were calculated and interpreted using Hopkins’ categorization criteria. Backs registered moderately more match RPE compared to pivots (p < 0.05, ES = 0.84). By contrast, wings experienced the highest values of fatigue and muscle soreness in MD+1 and MD+2 compared to all other playing positions (p < 0.05, ES = 0.66–0.93). Also, the wings reported moderately higher Hooper index scores in MD+1 and MD+2 than backs (p < 0.01, ES = 0.73–0.77). In relation to the player role, starters reported higher absolute values of match RPE, fatigue, muscle soreness, and the Hooper index in MD+1 compared to non-starters (p < 0.05, ES = 0.25–0.29). Additionally, regardless of the playing position and the role, all of the players reported moderately less fatigue and Hooper index scores in MD+2 compared to MD+1 (p < 0.05, ES = 0.66–1.34). Therefore, coaches and practitioners should consider the internal match load and well-being status of players to implement different training stimuli (e.g., recovery or compensatory strategies) in MD+1 according to playing positions and player roles.
The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of the playing position (backs vs. pivots vs. wings) and the player role (starter vs. non-starter) on the internal match load and well-being status of female handball players after official matches. Fourteen female handball players from the Spanish 2nd Division were monitored during a half-season (13 matches, n = 102 individual observations) using the rate of perceived exertion (match RPE) and the Hooper questionnaire in MD+1 and MD+2. Differences in match RPE according to playing positions and player roles were determined by one-way ANOVA or by a paired t-test, respectively. Differences in well-being status according to playing positions or player roles and time (MD+1 and MD+2) were assessed through mixed two-way ANOVA. Furthermore, partial eta-squared (ηp<sup>2</sup>) and Cohen’s d (ES) were calculated and interpreted using Hopkins’ categorization criteria. Backs registered moderately more match RPE compared to pivots (p < 0.05, ES = 0.84). By contrast, wings experienced the highest values of fatigue and muscle soreness in MD+1 and MD+2 compared to all other playing positions (p < 0.05, ES = 0.66–0.93). Also, the wings reported moderately higher Hooper index scores in MD+1 and MD+2 than backs (p < 0.01, ES = 0.73–0.77). In relation to the player role, starters reported higher absolute values of match RPE, fatigue, muscle soreness, and the Hooper index in MD+1 compared to non-starters (p < 0.05, ES = 0.25–0.29). Additionally, regardless of the playing position and the role, all of the players reported moderately less fatigue and Hooper index scores in MD+2 compared to MD+1 (p < 0.05, ES = 0.66–1.34). Therefore, coaches and practitioners should consider the internal match load and well-being status of players to implement different training stimuli (e.g., recovery or compensatory strategies) in MD+1 according to playing positions and player roles. Read More



